Research with Children
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Journal of Law & Medicine
- Vol. 24 (2-3), 213-244
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0098858800010418
Abstract
In the United States we have very mixed feelings about research with human subjects. The Nuremberg Code (the Code), which provides a foundation for the protection of human subjects, was written by American judges in the context of trying Nazi doctors who committed atrocious acts of human experimentation on concentration camp inmates. The Code provides ten common-sense guidelines controlling research. For example, a researcher may not conduct research on human subjects without that subject's informed consent, or if there is an a priori reason to believe that the research will cause death or disabling injury to the subject. What is remarkable about the creation of the Code is that it was thought to be necessary to document and impose the most fundamental moral principles on researchers. The Code demonstrates a remarkable suspicion of research with human subjects and those who perform such research.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Serotonin, Aggression, and Parental Psychopathology in Children With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1997
- Neuroendocrine Response to Fenfluramine Challenge in BoysArchives of General Psychiatry, 1997
- Conducting Research with Children: Legal and Ethical IssuesJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1996
- Gun Acquisition and Use by Juvenile OffendersJAMA, 1996
- Proxy Consent in the Experimentation SituationPerspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1974
- Minors and Health Care: The Age of ConsentOsgoode Hall Law Journal, 1973
- Preliminary CommunicationThe Lancet, 1953
- THE USE OF A SERIES OF VACCINES IN THE PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF AN EPIDEMIC OF PERTUSSISJAMA, 1914