Abstract
Attempting to throw light on the mechanical basis of movement of non-muscle (cf. muscle) cells, the present work aims to determine the form and distribution of actin and myosin in chick embryo fibroblasts. These cells were cultured on formvar, fixed in glutaraldehyde then osmium tetroxide vapours, dehydrated, critical-point dried and examined, in tow, in the electron microscope (EM). Stereoscopic pairs of micrographs were studied to define more exactly the form and distribution of cytoplasmic filaments topographically associated with deformations of the cell surface and with organelle movements through the cytoplasm. Permeating the cytoplasm, interconnecting long and short filaments closely surrounded all organelles, linked with microtubules and polyribosomes and joined to the plasma membrane. These filaments, which varied greatly in width (2–13 nm) were closely associated with large numbers of ‘comma-shaped’ globoid bodies of ∼15 nm diameter. Attempting to establish the identity, form and distribution of cytoplasmic myosin, cultured cells were extracted with a cold (4°C) glycerol/pyrophosphate solution for 24 h before being fixed and critical-point dried. EM examination of these cells revealed a residual three-dimensional network of branching and anastomosing 4–13 nm diameter smooth filaments, devoid of fine (2 nm) filaments and globoid bodies. Examination of fixed, critical-point dried, skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin showed globoid structures similar in form and size to the globoid bodies found in cultured fibroblasts. Similarly fixed and critical-point dried paracrystals of actin, polymerized in the presence of Mg2+, appeared as branching interconnecting filaments which, in form and dimensions, resembled the network filaments observed in pyrophosphate-extracted cells. It is concluded that the pyrophosphate-extractable globoid bodies found in cultured fibroblasts represent monomers of myosin, that the broader filaments to which these attach represent actin in Mg2+ paracrystalline form and that the various subcellular movements are brought about by interactions between the two, analogous to those occurring in muscle cells.