Profile comparisons of physical growth for monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs
- 1 January 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Annals of Human Biology
- Vol. 5 (4), 321-328
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03014467800002971
Abstract
Three different methods of analyzing similarity of physical growth curves within MZ [monozygotic] and DZ [dizygotic] twin pairs are compared. The concordance of the curves for each pair can be measured by either a multiple regression coefficient (R2) or the square root of the sum of squared differences between corresponding deviation points (D). The latter seems to be a more appropriate measure of profile contour similarity, mainly because the distance between curves is allowed for. An intra-class correlation based on a longitudinal analysis of variance seems to be a useful measure of average profile similarity for comparing groups of individuals. The distributions of the D measures, calculated for all MZ and DZ twin pairs , show MZ pairs to have significantly smaller D-values for both height and weight, on average, than DZ pairs. The intra-class correlations also show a higher concordance in developmental profile for MZ in comparison to DZ.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intra-pair similarity in physical growth of monozygotic and of dizygotic twins during pubertyAnnals of Human Biology, 1977
- A comparison of growth in twins and singleton controls of matched age followed longitudinally from 10 to 18 yearsAnnals of Human Biology, 1977
- Twins: Mental development in the preschool years.Developmental Psychology, 1974
- The secular trend in physical growth in SwedenAnnals of Human Biology, 1974
- Assessing similarity between profiles.Psychological Bulletin, 1953