Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 21 (6), 607-612
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00415.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Effect of the Transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the Quality of CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- The ethical problem of false positives: a prospective evaluation of physician reporting in the medical recordJournal of Medical Ethics, 2002
- Relieving the agony of the new pain management standardsAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 2000
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI)Medical Care, 2000
- From Understanding Health Care Provider Behavior to Improving Health CareMedical Care, 2000
- Comparison of Vignettes, Standardized Patients, and Chart Abstraction: A Prospective Validation Study of 3 Methods for Measuring QualityJAMA, 2000
- Lower body osteoarticular pain and dose of analgesic medications in older disabled women: the Women's Health and Aging Study.American Journal of Public Health, 1999
- Management of Pain in Elderly Patients With CancerJAMA, 1998
- Quality Improvement Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer PainJAMA, 1995