Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hepatology
- Vol. 35 (5), 1164-1171
- https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2002.33156
Abstract
This randomized, controlled trial assessed the efficacy of transarterial Lipiodol (Lipiodol Ultrafluide, Laboratoire Guerbet, Aulnay-Sous-Bois, France) chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. From March 1996 to October 1997, 80 out of 279 Asian patients with newly diagnosed unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma fulfilled the entry criteria and randomly were assigned to treatment with chemoembolization using a variable dose of an emulsion of cisplatin in Lipiodol and gelatin-sponge particles injected through the hepatic artery (chemoembolization group, 40 patients) or symptomatic treatment (control group, 40 patients). One patient assigned to the control group secondarily was excluded because of unrecognized systemic metastasis. Chemoembolization was repeated every 2 to 3 months unless there was evidence of contraindications or progressive disease. Survival was the main end point. The chemoembolization group received a total of 192 courses of chemoembolization with a median of 4.5 (range, 1-15) courses per patient. Chemoembolization resulted in a marked tumor response, and the actuarial survival was significantly better in the chemoembolization group (1 year, 57%; 2 years, 31%; 3 years, 26%) than in the control group (1 year, 32%; 2 years, 11%; 3 years, 3%; P = .002). When adjustments for baseline variables that were prognostic on univariate analysis were made with a multivariate Cox model, the survival benefit of chemoembolization remained significant (relative risk of death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; P = .006). Although death from liver failure was more frequent in patients who received chemoembolization, the liver functions of the survivors were not significantly different. In conclusion, in Asian patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, transarterial Lipiodol chemoembolization significantly improves survival and is an effective form of treatment.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Cirrhosis in the Era of Liver TransplantationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- Transarterial embolization versus symptomatic treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Results of a randomized, controlled trial in a single institutionHepatology, 1998
- Treatment of Hepatocellular CarcinomaHepatology, 1997
- Transcatheter oily chemoembolization in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Results of a western comparative study in 60 patientsHepatology, 1991
- Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by transcatheter arterial embolization combined with intraarterial infusion of a mixture of cisplatin and ethiodized oilGastroenterology, 1989
- A 5-year experience of lipiodolization: Selective regional chemotherapy for 200 patients with hepatocellular carcinomaHepatology, 1989
- Hepatic arterial embolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma—A randomized controlled trialGastroenterology, 1988
- A new approach to chemoembolization therapy for hepatoma using ethiodized oil, cisplatin, and gelatin spongeCancer, 1987
- Regional intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. A phase II studyCancer, 1986
- Non-operative arterial embolisation in primary liver tumours.BMJ, 1979