Pharmacy Benefits and the Use of Drugs by the Chronically Ill
Top Cited Papers
- 19 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 291 (19), 2344-2350
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.19.2344
Abstract
Research from JAMA — Pharmacy Benefits and the Use of Drugs by the Chronically Ill — ContextMany health plans have instituted more cost sharing to discourage use of more expensive pharmaceuticals and to reduce drug spending.ObjectiveTo determine how changes in cost sharing affect use of the most commonly used drug classes among the privately insured and the chronically ill.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRetrospective US study conducted from 1997 to 2000, examining linked pharmacy claims data with health plan benefit designs from 30 employers and 52 health plans. Participants were 528 969 privately insured beneficiaries aged 18 to 64 years and enrolled from 1 to 4 years (960 791 person-years).Main Outcome MeasureRelative change in drug days supplied (per member, per year) when co-payments doubled in a prototypical drug benefit plan.ResultsDoubling co-payments was associated with reductions in use of 8 therapeutic classes. The largest decreases occurred for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (45%) and antihistamines (44%). Reductions in overall days supplied of antihyperlipidemics (34%), antiulcerants (33%), antiasthmatics (32%), antihypertensives (26%), antidepressants (26%), and antidiabetics (25%) were also observed. Among patients diagnosed as having a chronic illness and receiving ongoing care, use was less responsive to co-payment changes. Use of antidepressants by depressed patients declined by 8%; use of antihypertensives by hypertensive patients decreased by 10%. Larger reductions were observed for arthritis patients taking NSAIDs (27%) and allergy patients taking antihistamines (31%). Patients with diabetes reduced their use of antidiabetes drugs by 23%.ConclusionsThe use of medications such as antihistamines and NSAIDs, which are taken intermittently to treat symptoms, was sensitive to co-payment changes. Other medications—antihypertensive, antiasthmatic, antidepressant, antihyperlipidemic, antiulcerant, and antidiabetic agents—also demonstrated significant price responsiveness. The reduction in use of medications for individuals in ongoing care was more modest. Still, significant increases in co-payments raise concern about adverse health consequences because of the large price effects, especially among diabetic patients.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Incentive-Based Formularies on Prescription-Drug Utilization and SpendingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Effect of Tiered Prescription Copayments on the Use of Preferred Brand MedicationsMedical Care, 2003
- Employer Drug Benefit Plans and Spending on Prescription DrugsJAMA, 2002
- Risk factor thresholds: their existence under scrutinyBMJ, 2002
- Outcomes of Reference Pricing for Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme InhibitorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes with Lifestyle Intervention or MetforminNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Effect of a Three-Tier Prescription Copay on Pharmaceutical and Other Medical UtilizationMedical Care, 2001
- Adverse Events Associated With Prescription Drug Cost-Sharing Among Poor and Elderly PersonsJAMA, 2001
- The Effect of Drug Co-Payments on Utilization and Cost of Pharmaceuticals in a Health Maintenance OrganizationMedical Care, 1990
- Use of Selected Drugs and ProceduresMedical Care, 1986