The use of plasma HIV RNA as a study endpoint in efficacy trials of antiretroviral drugs
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in AIDS
- Vol. 13 (7), 797-804
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-199905070-00008
Abstract
To evaluate the utility of HIV RNA as an endpoint in antiretroviral efficacy studies. Data collected from antiretroviral efficacy trials were analyzed to explore relationships between clinical progression and the magnitude, nadir and duration of HIV RNA reductions. The proportion of patients suppressing HIV RNA below assay quantification, time to maximal virologic response, and loss of virologic response in relation to pretreatment characteristics were also analyzed. Analyses were conducted using data from individual antiretoviral efficacy trials or groups of trials that studied similar types of drug regimens and used similar HIV RNA assays. Treatment regimens were pooled for most analyses. Clinical progression was defined as the occurrence of an AIDS-defining event (essentially Centers of Disease Control criteria) or death. Treatment-induced reductions in HIV RNA approximating total assay variability of about 0.5 log10 copies/ml were associated with decreases in the risk of clinical progression. Larger and more sustained reductions in HIV RNA were directly associated with lower risks for disease progression. Lower initial HIV RNA reductions were associated with more durable HIV RNA suppression. For antiretoviral efficacy studies, plasma HIV RNA is a suitable study endpoint that is likely to predict a decreased risk for AIDS progression and death. Because greater and more sustained reductions in HIV RNA appear to confer greater reductions in clinical risk, maintaining maximal suppression of plasma HIV RNA, particularly below the limits of assay quantification, appears to be a rigorous benchmark for assessing the efficacy of antiretroviral regimens.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomised placebo-controlled trial of ritonavir in advanced HIV-1 diseaseThe Lancet, 1998
- Safety and Antiviral Activity of Combination Therapy With Zidovudine, Zalcitabine, and Two Doses of Interferon-α2a in Patients With HIVJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 1997
- A Controlled Trial of Two Nucleoside Analogues plus Indinavir in Persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and CD4 Cell Counts of 200 per Cubic Millimeter or LessNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1997. Updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA panelPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Randomised trial of addition of lamivudine or lamivudine plus loviride to zidovudine-containing regimens for patients with HIV-1 infection: the CAESAR trialThe Lancet, 1997
- Nevirapine, Zidovudine, and Didanosine Compared with Zidovudine and Didanosine in Patients with HIV-1 InfectionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection with Saquinavir, Zidovudine, and ZalcitabineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The Women and Infants Transmission Study (WITS) of Maternal-Infant HIV Transmission: Study Design, Methods, and Baseline DataJournal of Women's Health, 1996
- Treatment with Lamivudine, Zidovudine, or Both in HIV-Positive Patients with 200 to 500 CD4+ Cells per Cubic MillimeterNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Reduction of Maternal-Infant Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 with Zidovudine TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994