Efficacy of immobilized polyplexes and lipoplexes for substrate‐mediated gene delivery
- 2 December 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Biotechnology & Bioengineering
- Vol. 102 (6), 1679-1691
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22212
Abstract
Non‐viral gene delivery by immobilization of complexes to cell‐adhesive biomaterials, a process termed substrate‐mediated delivery, has many in vitro research applications such as transfected cell arrays or models of tissue growth. In this report, we quantitatively investigate the efficiency of gene delivery by surface immobilization, and compare this efficiency to the more typical bolus delivery. The ability to immobilize vectors while allowing cellular internalization is impacted by the biomaterial and vector properties. Thus, to compare this efficiency between vector types and delivery methods, transfection conditions were initially identified that maximized transgene expression. For surface delivery from tissue culture polystyrene, DNA complexes were immobilized to pre‐adsorbed serum proteins prior to cell seeding, while for bolus delivery, complexes were added to the media above adherent cells. Mathematical modeling of vector binding, release, and cell association using a two‐site model indicated that the kinetics of polyplex binding to cells was faster than for lipoplexes, yet both vectors have a half‐life on the surface of approximately 17 min. For bolus and surface delivery, the majority of the DNA in the system remained in solution or on the surface, respectively. For polyplexes, the efficiency of trafficking of cell‐associated polyplexes to the nucleus for surface delivery is similar or less than bolus delivery, suggesting that surface immobilization may decrease the activity of the complex. The efficiency of nuclear association for cell‐associated lipoplexes is similar or greater for surface delivery relative to bolus. These studies suggest that strategies to enhance surface delivery for polyplexes should target the vector design to enhance its potency, whereas enhancing lipoplex delivery should target the material design to increase internalization. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009;102: 1679–1691.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gene expression and internalization following vector adsorption to immobilized proteins: dependence on protein identity and densityThe Journal of Gene Medicine, 2007
- Gene Delivery by Immobilization to Cell-Adhesive SubstratesMRS Bulletin, 2005
- Multilayered polyelectrolyte films promote the direct and localized delivery of DNA to cellsJournal of Controlled Release, 2005
- Controlled release systems for DNA deliveryMolecular Therapy, 2004
- RNA interference microarrays: High-throughput loss-of-function genetics in mammalian cellsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004
- In vitro cytotoxicity testing of polycations: influence of polymer structure on cell viability and hemolysisBiomaterials, 2002
- Applications of transfected cell microarrays in high-throughput drug discoveryDrug Discovery Today, 2002
- Surface-Tethered DNA Complexes for Enhanced Gene DeliveryBioconjugate Chemistry, 2002
- Quantitative analysis of correlation between number of nuclear plasmids and gene expression activity after transfection with cationic liposomes.Pharmaceutical Research, 2002
- Application of membrane-based dendrimer/DNA complexes for solid phase transfection in vitro and in vivoBiomaterials, 2000