Manual record keeping is not necessary for anesthesia vigilance
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
- Vol. 11 (1), 9-13
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01627413
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of automatic record keeping on vigilance and record keeping timeBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995
- Monitor Surveillance and Vigilance of Anesthesia ResidentsAnesthesiology, 1994
- An Objective Methodology for Task Analysis and Workload Assessment in Anesthesia ProvidersAnesthesiology, 1994
- The automated anesthetic record is inevitable and valuableJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1990
- Observer reliability in detecting surreptitious random occlusions of the monaural esophageal stethoscopeJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1990
- A498 TASK ANALYSIS/WORKLOAD OF ANESTHETISTS PERFORMING GENERAL ANESTHESIAAnesthesiology, 1990
- A416 COMPARISON OF VIGILANCE USING AUTOMATED VERSUS HAND WRITTEN RECORDSAnesthesiology, 1990
- Why investigate vigilance?Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1986
- Computerized Anesthesia Records May Be DangerousAnesthesiology, 1986
- Analysis of Tasks and Human Factors in Anesthesia for Coronary-Artery BypassAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1976