Complications following gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with head and neck cancer: a prospective multi‐institution study, systematic review and meta‐analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 8 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Otolaryngology
- Vol. 34 (2), 103-112
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01889.x
Abstract
Objectives: To measure morbidity and mortality rates following insertion of gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients. To determine evidence for any relationship between gastrostomy insertion technique and complication rates. Design: A prospective cohort study and qualitative systematic review. Setting: Multi‐cancer networks in the South West of England, Hampshire and the Isle of White. Participants: One hundred and seventy‐two patients with head and neck cancer undergoing gastrostomy tube insertion between 2004 and 2005. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was performed in 121 patients. Fifty‐one patients had radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG). Twenty‐seven studies reporting outcomes following 2353 gastrostomy procedures for head and neck cancer. Main outcome measures: Post‐procedure mortality, major and minor complications. Results: In the present series, mortality rates were 1.0% (1/121) for PEG and 3.9% (2/51) for RIG. Overall major complication rates following PEG and RIG were 3.3% (4/121) and 15.6% (9/51) respectively. In our systematic review and meta‐analysis of 2379 head and neck cancer patients, we observed fatality rates of 2.2% (95% CI 0.014–0.034) following PEG and 1.8% (95% CI 0.010–0.032) following RIG. Furthermore, major complication rates following PEG were 7.4% (95% CI 5.9–9.3%) and 8.9% (95% CI 7.0–11.2%) after RIG. Conclusions: Procedure related mortality rates following gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients are higher than those in mixed patient populations. Major complication rates following RIG in head and neck cancer patients are greater than those following PEG. Major complications following PEG in patients with head and neck cancer appear no worse than in mixed pathology groups. We have identified that RIG is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients who are ineligible for PEG. The serious nature of the complications associated with gastrostomy particularly in patients with head and neck cancer requires careful consideration by the referring physician.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- PEG and RIG tube feeding in Head and Neck patients: a retrospective review of complications and outcomeJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2007
- Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) - a long-term follow-up study in head and neck cancer patientsClinical Otolaryngology, 2004
- Early percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy nutrition in head and neck cancer patientsActa Oto-Laryngologica, 2004
- ‘Push’ versus ‘pull’ percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancerThe Laryngoscope, 2003
- Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancerEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2001
- Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patientsOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 1999
- The use of radiologically placed gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1996
- Percutaneous feeding gastrostomy in patients with head and neck tumors: A 5‐year reviewThe Laryngoscope, 1990
- Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Head and Neck Cancer PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 1989
- Techniques and ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 1985