Sox2 and Oct‐3/4: a versatile pair of master regulators that orchestrate the self‐renewal and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells
- 22 September 2009
- journal article
- focus article
- Published by Wiley in Wires Systems Biology and Medicine
- Vol. 1 (2), 228-236
- https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.12
Abstract
During the past 10 years, remarkable progress has been made in understanding the transcriptional mechanisms that control the biology of stem cells. Given the importance of stem cells in development, regenerative medicine, and cancer, it is no surprise that the pace of discovery continues to accelerate—paradigm‐shifting models proposed only a few years ago are quickly giving way to even more sophisticated models of regulation. This review summarizes some of the major advances made in delineating the roles of two transcription factors, Sox2 and Oct‐3/4, in stem cell biology. Additionally, unanswered questions related to their mechanisms of action are discussed. When viewed together, it is evident that Sox2 and Oct‐3/4 exhibit the major properties expected of master regulators. They are each essential for mammalian development, they help regulate the transcription of other genes that are essential for development, and they influence their own transcription by both positive and negative feedback loops. Moreover, small changes in the levels of either Sox2 or Oct‐3/4 trigger the differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells. Thus, each functions as a molecular rheostat to control the self‐renewal and pluripotency of ES cells. Overall, understanding how Sox2 and Oct‐3/4 function mechanistically will not only provide important insights into stem cells in general, but should also have a significant impact on our understanding of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells and, hence, the emerging field of regenerative medicine. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. This article is categorized under: Developmental Biology > Stem Cell Biology and RegenerationKeywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Octamer 4 Small Interfering RNA Results in Cancer Stem Cell–Like Cell ApoptosisCancer Research, 2008
- Reprogramming of Neural Progenitor Cells into Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Absence of Exogenous Sox2 ExpressionThe International Journal of Cell Cloning, 2008
- Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factorsNature, 2008
- Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compoundsNature Biotechnology, 2008
- Improved Efficiency and Pace of Generating Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Human Adult and Fetal FibroblastsThe International Journal of Cell Cloning, 2008
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic CellsScience, 2007
- Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblastsNature Biotechnology, 2007
- Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined FactorsCell, 2006
- Molecular Mechanism to Maintain Stem Cell Renewal of ES Cells.Cell Structure and Function, 2001
- New type of POU domain in germ line-specific protein Oct-4Nature, 1990