Obtaining medically meaningful answers from an overview of randomized clinical trials
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 6 (3), 281-286
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060314
Abstract
Answers that have medical value can often be obtained from overviews of randomized clinical trials if care is taken in formulating a biologically sensible question and unbiased and careful methods are used in collecting, extracting and analysing the results. This article discusses some of the pitfalls that are encountered during this process, outlines some solutions and emphasizes the need for a conservative interpretation of the results.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inter‐study differences: How should they influence the interpretation and analysis of results?Statistics in Medicine, 1987
- Effects on overviews of early stopping rules for clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- Effect of vasodilators on survival in chronic congestive heart failureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- Effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on mortality after myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- A Double-Blind Trial of Metoprolol in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- LIGNOCAINE PROPHYLAXIS IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: AN EVALUATION OF RANDOMISED TRIALSThe Lancet, 1981
- The FDA's Critique of the Anturane Reinfarction TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Sulfinpyrazone in the Prevention of Sudden Death after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Combining results of independent studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1978