Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 193 (2), 171-183
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.010
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-analysis of the value of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications associated with pancreatic surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Pancreaticojejunal Anastomosis Is Preferable to Pancreaticogastrostomy after Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Longterm Outcomes of Pancreatic Exocrine FunctionJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2005
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Results of Duct-To-Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy for Pancreaticoduodenectomy Billroth I Type Reconstruction in 100 Consecutive PatientsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2001
- Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statementBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy in reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Pancreaticogastrostomy Compared with Pancreaticojejunostomy after PancreaticoduodenectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Restoration of continuity following pancreaticoduodenectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY VERSUS PANCREATICOGASTROSTOMY IN RECONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING PANCREATICODUODENECTOMYAnz Journal of Surgery, 1990
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986