Emulation of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) components with the 3-shell head model and the problem of ‘ghost potential fields’ when using an average reference in brain mapping
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section
- Vol. 77 (4), 243-258
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(90)90063-j
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sequential mapping favours the hypothesis of distinct generators for Na and Pa middle latency auditory evoked potentialsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1988
- Mathematical dipoles are adequate to describe realistic generators of human brain activityIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1988
- Separate generators with distinct orientations for N20 and P22 somatosensory evoked potentials to finger stimulation?Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1986
- A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studiesElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1985
- American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Clinical Evoked Potential StudiesJournal Of Clinical Neurophysiology, 1984
- Computer generation of surface distribution maps of measures of brain activityComputers in Biology and Medicine, 1982
- Short latency SEPs to median nerve stimulation: Comparison of recording methods and origin of componentsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1981
- Location of Sources of Evoked Scalp Potentials: Corrections for Skull and Scalp ThicknessesIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1981
- Methods for the Localization of Electrical Sources in the Human BrainPublished by Elsevier ,1980
- Somatosensory evoked potential in man: Far field potentialsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1976