Deferred Treatment for Prostate Cancer
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 62 (3), 249-253
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1988.tb04328.x
Abstract
Summary— The clinical outcome of 278 prostate cancer patients managed by a deferred treatment policy was analysed retrospectively. Following TURP or biopsy, all patients were asymptomatic and deemed suitable for management by a deferred treatment policy, i.e. hormone therapy or other forms of treatment were only initiated if and when symptomatic progression occurred. The overall 5-year survival rate was 30%; 18% of patients died from other causes without needing treatment for their prostate cancer; 11% were alive and untreated after 5 years' follow-up; 17% died from prostate cancer without further treatment. Poor tumour grade, anaemia, metastatic disease, a short history, presentation with retention, and a raised serum creatinine at presentation were associated with a poor prognosis.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prostatectomy: Patients' Perception and Long‐term Follow‐UPBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- Trials and Tribulations in Prostatic CancerBritish Journal of Urology, 1987
- Is Delayed Treatment Justified in Carcinoma of the Prostate?British Journal of Urology, 1985
- The Value of the Ancillary Factor Scoring SystemPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- Histologic Grading of Primary Prostatic Cancer: A New Approach to an Old ProblemJournal of Urology, 1980
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examplesBritish Journal of Cancer, 1977
- Factors in the Prognosis of Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Cooperative StudyJournal of Urology, 1968