Anturane Reinfarction Trial
- 19 March 1981
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 304 (12), 730
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198103193041212
Abstract
To the Editor: The FDA's critique1 of the Anturane (sulfinpyrazone) reinfarction trial2 , 3 and the accompanying editorial4 contain important lessons for the conduct and reporting of clinical trials.In the first place, it is clear that after a finding of possible bias in exclusions from analysis, the FDA had no choice but to withhold judgment on the study results. However, few clinical trials could withstand comparable review without evidence of blemish. Allocation of deaths to various causes and application of inevitably diffuse exclusion criteria are notoriously subject to error and unintended bias. For this reason most critical observers urge documentation and . . .Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sulfinpyrazone after Myocardial Infarction: No Decision YetNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- The FDA's Critique of the Anturane Reinfarction TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Influence of Adherence to Treatment and Response of Cholesterol on Mortality in the Coronary Drug ProjectNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Sulfinpyrazone in the Prevention of Sudden Death after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- A co-operative trial in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease using clofibrate. Report from the Committee of Principal Investigators.Heart, 1978
- Sulfinpyrazone in the Prevention of Cardiac Death after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978