A Revisit to Contingency Table and Tests of Independence: Bootstrap is Preferred to Chi-Square Approximations as Well as Fisher’s Exact Test
- 4 June 2014
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Vol. 25 (3), 438-458
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2014.920851
Abstract
To test the mutual independence of two qualitative variables (or attributes), it is a common practice to follow the Chi-square tests (Pearson's as well as likelihood ratio test) based on data in the form of a contingency table. However, it should be noted that these popular Chi-square tests are asymptotic in nature and are useful when the cell frequencies are "not too small." In this article, we explore the accuracy of the Chi-square tests through an extensive simulation study and then propose their bootstrap versions that appear to work better than the asymptotic Chi-square tests. The bootstrap tests are useful even for small-cell frequencies as they maintain the nominal level quite accurately. Also, the proposed bootstrap tests are more convenient than the Fisher's exact test which is often criticized for being too conservative. Finally, all test methods are applied to a few real-life datasets for demonstration purposes.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing the equality of several gamma means: a parametric bootstrap method with applicationsComputational Statistics, 2010
- A Revisit to the Behrens–Fisher Problem: Comparison of Five Test MethodsCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 2008
- Chi‐squared and Fisher–Irwin tests of two‐by‐two tables with small sample recommendationsStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Categorical Data AnalysisWiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 2002
- The Wilcoxon, Spearman, Fisher, χ 2 -, Student and Pearson Tests and 2 × 2 TablesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1995
- A Survey of Exact Inference for Contingency TablesStatistical Science, 1992
- A bayesian test for a two-way contingency table using independence priorsThe Canadian Journal of Statistics / La Revue Canadienne de Statistique, 1990
- Pearson's X 2 and the Loglikelihood Ratio Statistic G 2 : A Comparative ReviewInternational Statistical Review, 1989
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 TestsBiometrics, 1954
- The $\chi^2$ Test of Goodness of FitThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1952