The validity of experimental pain measures
- 1 December 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 17 (4), 369-376
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(83)90168-9
Abstract
Human subjects (40) served in a study investigating the characteristics of experimental pain measures. Subjects indicated when their pain threshold and tolerance levels had been reached with each of 3 stressors: cold, pressure and electrical shock. Using the multitrait-multimethod matrix procedure, the measures of threshold and tolerance showed both generality and discriminant validity across stressors. Threshold judgements, which emphasize discrimination of nociceptive quality, and tolerance decisions, which indicate an unwillingness to receive more intense stimuli, are not equivalent measures of responsiveness. Both should be obtained in studies involving experimental pain. Stressors, while related, are not equivalent. Minimum method variance was associated with the discomfort produced by electrical pulse trains.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnitude scales for cold pressor painPerception & Psychophysics, 1981
- A comparison of four tests for assessing the pain sensitivity of different subjects and test areasPain, 1977
- The Cold Pressor Test and Autonomic Function: A Review and IntegrationPsychophysiology, 1975
- Responsiveness To Pain: Stimulus-Specificity Versus GeneralityThe Psychological Record, 1973
- A STRAIN GAUGE PAIN STIMULATORPsychophysiology, 1971
- Heat pain and pressure painPsychonomic Science, 1967
- The relationship of experimental pain tolerance to pain threshold.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1964
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959
- Individual differences in pain thresholds.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1956
- Phasic Pains Induced by ColdJournal of Applied Physiology, 1949