Transrectal Ultrasound Examination of the Prostate: Complications and Acceptance by Patients
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 71 (4), 457-459
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb15992.x
Abstract
Summary— Transrectal ultrasound scan (TRUS) of the prostate was performed on 511 patients, 391 of whom also underwent between 1 and 5 transrectal 1.2 mm core biopsies. The infection rate in the whole group was 4.1%; 32% of the patients were given antibiotic prophylaxis with norfloxacin 400 mg twice daily for 1 week and in this group the infection rate was 0.8%. In the remaining patients, who received 400 mg norfloxacin at the time of biopsy and another 400 mg the same evening, the infection rate was 5.6%. The only risk factor identified for post–biopsy infection was steroid medication. Only minor discomfort (or none at all) was reported by 95% of patients during the examination procedure. If TRUS was combined with core biopsy 92% reported either minor or no discomfort. Of 78 patients who experienced both finger-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy and TRUS-guided core biopsy 82% preferred the latter procedure. TRUS and core biopsy proved acceptable to most patients. Antibiotic treatment with 2 tablets of norfloxacin failed to prevent infection.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prostate Cancer Detection in a Clinical Urological Practice by Ultrasonography, Digital Rectal Examination and Prostate Specific AntigenJournal of Urology, 1990
- State of the art: endorectal sonography of the prostate gland.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1990
- Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of prostatic carcinoma.Radiology, 1989
- The zonal anatomy of the prostateThe Prostate, 1981
- Anaerobic Infection as a Consequence of Transrectal Prostatic BiopsyJournal of Urology, 1978
- Complications of Transrectal Aspiration Biopsy of the ProstateScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1975