Biobehavioral, Immune, and Health Benefits following Recurrence for Psychological Intervention Participants
Open Access
- 14 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 16 (12), 3270-3278
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-0278
Abstract
Purpose: A clinical trial was designed to test the hypothesis that a psychological intervention could reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. Newly diagnosed regional breast cancer patients (n = 227) were randomized to the intervention-with-assessment or the assessment-only arm. The intervention had positive psychological, social, immune, and health benefits, and after a median of 11 years the intervention arm was found to have reduced the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.55; P = 0.034). In follow-up, we hypothesized that the intervention arm might also show longer survival after recurrence. If observed, we then would examine potential biobehavioral mechanisms. Experimental Design: All patients were followed; 62 recurred. Survival analyses included all 62. Upon recurrence diagnosis, those available for further biobehavioral study were accrued (n = 41, 23 intervention and 18 assessment). For those 41, psychological, social, adherence, health, and immune (natural killer cell cytotoxicity, T-cell proliferation) data were collected at recurrence diagnosis and 4, 8, and 12 months later. Results: Intent-to-treat analysis revealed reduced risk of death following recurrence for the intervention arm (hazard ratio, 0.41; P = 0.014). Mixed-effects follow-up analyses with biobehavioral data showed that all patients responded with significant psychological distress at recurrence diagnosis, but thereafter only the intervention arm improved (P values < 0.023). Immune indices were significantly higher for the intervention arm at 12 months (P values < 0.017). Conclusions: Hazards analyses augment previous findings in showing improved survival for the intervention arm after recurrence. Follow-up analyses showing biobehavioral advantages for the intervention arm contribute to our understanding of how improved survival was achieved. Clin Cancer Res; 16(12); 3270–8. ©2010 AACR.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychologic intervention improves survival for breast cancer patientsCancer, 2008
- The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growthOncogene, 2008
- Immune-mediated dormancy: an equilibrium with cancerJournal of Leukocyte Biology, 2008
- Stress and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Recurrence: Moderation or Mediation of Coping?Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2008
- Surviving recurrence: Psychological and quality‐of‐life recoveryCancer, 2008
- Immune cells as mediators of solid tumor metastasisCancer and Metastasis Reviews, 2007
- Current Immunotherapeutic Strategies in Breast CancerSurgical Oncology Clinics of North America, 2007
- Effects of supportive‐expressive group therapy on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancerCancer, 2007
- Distress reduction from a psychological intervention contributes to improved health for cancer patientsBrain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2007
- Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized experiments.Health Psychology, 1995