On the Division of Attention: A Disproof of the Single Channel Hypothesis
Open Access
- 1 May 1972
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 24 (2), 225-235
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00335557243000102
Abstract
In dichotic listening, subjects are apparently unable to attend simultaneously to two concurrent, auditory speech messages. However, in two experiments reported here, it is shown that people can attend to and repeat back continuous speech at the same time as taking in complex, unrelated visual scenes, or even while sight-reading piano music. In both cases performance with divided attention was very good, and in the case of sight-reading was as good as with undivided attention. There was little or no effect of the dual task on the accuracy of speech shadowing. These results are incompatible with the hypothesis that human attention is limited by the capacity of a general–purpose central processor in the nervous system. An alternative, “multi-channel”, hypothesis is outlined.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Parallel encoding within and between elementary stimulus dimensionsPerception & Psychophysics, 1971
- An Extension of the Conflict between Visualization and ReadingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
- Memory for nonattended auditory material*1Cognitive Psychology, 1970
- Remarks on attention controlActa Psychologica, 1970
- Parallel processing in complex visual discriminationPerception & Psychophysics, 1969
- Successiveness Discrimination as a Two-State, Quantal ProcessScience, 1967
- The Suppression of Visualization by ReadingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967
- Attention: Some theoretical considerations.Psychological Review, 1963
- Perception and communication.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1958
- Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two EarsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1953