Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: A comparison of late results in 1,593 patients
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 47 (3), 352-361
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(89)90373-1
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aortic Valve Replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Bioprosthesis: Clinical and Hemodynamic ResultsJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 1988
- Carpentier-Edwards Standard Porcine Bioprosthesis: Primary Tissue Failure (Structural Valve Deterioration) by Age GroupsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Performance of the Hancock Porcine Bioprosthesis Following Aortic Valve Replacement: Considerations Based on a 15-Year ExperienceThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Comparison of outcome after valve replacement with a bioprosthesis versus a mechanical prosthesis: Initial 5 year results of a randomized trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Biological versus mechanical valvesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1987
- Comparative study of primary tissue valve failure between lonescu-shiley pericardial and Hancock porcine valves in the aortic positionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- Incidence of primary tissue valve failure with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valveThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1985
- Valve failure with the Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprosthesis: Analysis of 2680 patientsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1985
- The Björk-Shiley valveThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1981
- Chronic intravascular hemolysis after aortic valve replacement with Ionescu-Shiley xenograft: Comparative study with Bjork-Shiley prosthesisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980