Spinal metastasis in the elderly
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Spine Journal
- Vol. 12 (2), S202-S213
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0609-9
Abstract
Bony metastases are a frequent problem in elderly patients affected by cancer, and those with bony metastases involve the spine in approx. 50%. The most frequent spinal metastases (60%) are from breast, lung, or prostate cancer. The chance that an elderly patient (60–79 years old) is affected by bony metastases is four times higher in men and three times higher in women than a middle-aged patient (40–59 years old). Since the medical treatment with all the adjuvant treatment options prolong the survival of this particular patient group, the spinal metastases may become a mechanical issue, thus requesting surgical treatment. Different classification systems have been proposed to rationalize surgical indications, some concentrating solely on the local spinal tumor involvement and some including the overall clinical situation. Since most of the surgical options are of palliative character, it is more important to base the decision on an overall clinical classification including the different treatment modalities—irradiation, chemotherapy, steroids, bisphosphonates, and surgery—to make a shared decision. In case surgery is indicated—neural compression, pathological fracture, instability, and progressive deformity, nursing reasons—the most straightforward procedures should be chosen, which may not need an intensive care unit stay. In the thoracolumbar spine a posterior decompression and posterolateral vertebral body resection through a posterior approach only, with a concomitant reconstruction and stabilization, has shown to work sufficiently well. In the middle and lower cervical spine the anterior approach with anterior decompression and anterior column reconstruction is most effective and has a low morbidity, whereas the occipitocervical junction can generally be treated by posterior resection and stabilization. The outcome should be determined by the survival time in an ambulatory, independent status, where pain is controlled, and the patient is not hospitalized. Surgical management shows the greatest improvement in pain reduction, but also in other domains of quality of life. Since prospective randomized studies comparing different treatment modalities for spinal metastases including surgery are not available and are ethically difficult to achieve, each case remains an interdisciplinary, shared decision making process for what is considered best for a patient or elderly patient. However, whenever surgery is an option, it should be planned before irradiation since surgery after irradiation has a significant higher complication rate.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of Life in Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Spine DiseaseSpine, 2003
- Multiple Myeloma: Surgery of the SpineSpine, 2002
- Spinal Radiation Before Surgical Decompression Adversely Affects Outcomes of Surgery for Symptomatic Metastatic Spinal Cord CompressionSpine, 2001
- Metastatic Disease of the Cervical SpineClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1999
- Global cancer statisticsCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1999
- Vertebral MetastasesSpine, 1997
- Use of corticosteroids in neuro-oncologyAnti-Cancer Drugs, 1995
- Posterior Segmental Spinal Instrumentation (PSSI) with Posterolateral Decompression and Debulking for Metastatic Thoracic and Lumbar Spine DiseaseSpine, 1988
- Angiographic study of the effect of laminectomy in the presence of acute anterior epidural massesJournal of Neurosurgery, 1976
- THE FUNCTION OF THE VERTEBRAL VEINS AND THEIR ROLE IN THE SPREAD OF METASTASESAnnals of Surgery, 1940