Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of AcrySof IQ Natural aspherical intraocular lens
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 33 (4), 603-610
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.009
Abstract
To evaluate contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of an AcrySof IQ Natural SN60WF aspherical intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories). Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India. One hundred twenty consecutive patients who had phacoemulsification in a prospective triple-masked trial were randomized to receive an AcrySof SA60AT IOL (40 eyes), AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOL (40 eyes), or AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL (40 eyes). At 3 months, contrast sensitivity was measured using the CSV-1000E contrast sensitivity chart test face (Vector Vision) at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degrees (cpd) under photopic conditions (85 cd/m(2)) and mesopic conditions (2.7 cd/m(2)) with 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm fixed central apertures, with and without glare. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used and a pair-wise comparison performed. The main outcome measure was the difference in contrast sensitivity between IOLs at each spatial frequency. The best corrected visual acuity was similar between the 3 IOL groups (P = .6). The AcrySof IQ group had significantly higher contrast sensitivity at 18 cpd under photopic conditions (P = .008); at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd during mesopic testing with a 4.0 mm aperture without glare (P = .018, P = .011, P = .007, and P = .0001, respectively) and with glare (P = .003, P = .006, P = .005, and P = .004, respectively); and at all spatial frequencies during mesopic testing with a 6.0 mm aperture without glare (P = .018, P = .006, P = .009, and P = .0001, respectively) and with glare (P = .019, P = .002, P = .01, and P = .017, respectively). Eyes with the AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL had significantly higher contrast sensitivity than eyes with an AcrySof SA60AT or AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOL at all spatial frequencies during mesopic testing (with and without glare) with 4.0 and 6.0 mm artificial pupil.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting the Optical Performance of Eyes Implanted with IOLs to Correct Spherical AberrationInvestigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 2006
- Early visual results with the rollable ThinOptX intraocular lensJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2004
- Corneal Optical Aberrations and Retinal Image Quality in Patients in Whom Monofocal Intraocular Lenses Were ImplantedArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 2002
- Calculated impact of higher-order monochromatic aberrations on retinal image quality in a population of human eyes: erratumJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 2002
- Effect of Chromatic Aberration on Contrast Sensitivity in Pseudophakic EyesArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 2001
- Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantationOphthalmology, 1999
- Contrast sensitivity and glare in patients with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lensJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1993
- Effect of yellow-tinted lenses on brightnessJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1990
- THE EFFECT OF A YELLOW FILTER ON CONTRAST SENSITIVITYOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1984
- Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthoodVision Research, 1983