Does the type of suture material contribute to the strength of the lateral paramedian incision?
- 1 March 1982
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 69 (3), 163-165
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800690318
Abstract
A prospective randomized trial was carried out on 231 consecutive laparotomies in which the lateral paramedian incision was used in all cases. Closure of the wound was identical except for the anterior rectus sheath where closure was randomized to (a) chromic catgut, (b) polyglycolic acid or (c) polypropylene. Follow-up for 1 year has revealed no wound dehiscences and only one incisional hernia (in the catgut group). We conclude that the lateral paramedian incision is inherently strong, and that this strength is due to splintage of the wound by the rectus abdominis muscle itself and is unrelated to the type of suture material used.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abdominal wound closure: A trial of Prolene and DexonBritish Journal of Surgery, 1980
- Vertical abdominal incisions—a choice?British Journal of Surgery, 1980
- The burst abdominal wound: A mechanical approachBritish Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materialsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1976
- A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy woundsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975
- EFFECT OF METHOD OF OPENING AND CLOSING THE ABDOMEN ON INCIDENCE OF WOUND BURSTINGThe Lancet, 1972
- The suturing of abdominal incisions. A comparison of monofilament nylon and catgutBritish Journal of Surgery, 1967
- Wound DehiscenceArchives of Surgery, 1966
- ABDOMINAL WOUND DISRUPTIONThe Lancet, 1965
- Burst AbdomenPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1960