Serum neuron-specific enolase (S-NSE) and the prognosis in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): a combined multivariable analysis on data from nine centres
Open Access
- 1 August 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 74 (3), 463-467
- https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.383
Abstract
The influence of pretreatment serum neuron-specific enolase (S-NSE) in addition to more conventional prognostic factors on survival duration in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was investigated in 770 patients from nine centres in six countries. The other variables included stage of disease, performance status (PS), age, sex, serum lactate dehydrogenase (S-LDH), serum alkaline phosphatase (S-AP), and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (S-CEA). Increased values of S-NSE (> 12.5 micrograms-1 l) were observed in 81% of the patients, whereas S-LDH, S-AP and S-CEA were elevated in only half of the patients or less. Multivariable analysis by Cox's proportional hazard model disclosed S-NSE as the most powerful prognostic factor followed by poor PS and extensive stage disease. If PS was ignored, S-LDH came up as a significant prognostic factor. S-AP, S-CEA, age and sex had no significant influence on the prognosis. The three prognostic factors, S-NSE, PS and stage of disease, enabled establishment of a prognostic index (PI) based on a simple algorithm PI = zNSE + z(stage) + 2zPS. This segregated the patients into four groups with clearly different prognosis. The median survival and 95% confidence intervals of the four groups were: 468 days (540-408), 362 days (405-328), 256 days (270-241) and 125 days (179-58). Based on the present results we recommend S-NSE and PS, in addition to stage, for prognostic stratification in treatment trials on SCLC.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: A simple prognostic index is better than conventional stagingEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1987
- Pretreatment prognostic factors and scoring system in 407 small‐cell lung cancer patientsInternational Journal of Cancer, 1987
- PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - MULTIVARIATE MODEL BASED ON 778 PATIENTS TREATED WITH CHEMOTHERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT IRRADIATION1986
- PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF LABORATORY PARAMETERS MEASURED AT DIAGNOSIS IN SMALL CELL-CARCINOMA OF THE LUNG1985
- Serum Neuron-Specific EnolaseChest, 1985
- SERUM NEURON-SPECIFIC ENOLASE: A MARKER FOR DISEASE EXTENT AND RESPONSE TO THERAPY OF SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCERThe Lancet, 1982
- LABORATORY PARAMETERS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PERFORMANCE STATUS IN PROGNOSTIC STRATIFICATION OF PATIENTS WITH SMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER1981
- PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS OF STAGE OF DISEASE AND SITES OF METASTASES IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL CELL-CARCINOMA OF THE LUNG TREATED WITH INTENSIVE COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPYPublished by Elsevier ,1981
- CYCLIC ALTERNATING COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR SMALL CELL BRONCHOGENIC CARCINOMA1979
- CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AND CCNU IN TREATMENT OF INOPERABLE SMALL CELL-CARCINOMA AND ADENOCARCINOMA OF LUNG1976