Cross Modality Facilitation in Tachistoscopic Word Recognition
Open Access
- 1 February 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Vol. 35 (1), 79-96
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748308402118
Abstract
In its old form, the logogen model (Morton, 1969) would have predicted extensive cross-model facilitation of tachistoscopic word recognition. An experiment by Winnick and Daniel (1970) violated this prediction by showing no effects on subsequent visual word recognition of naming a picture or filling a definition. The latter results was replicated, and it was also found that pretraining with handwritten words transferred to printed words from 10-45 min later. A further experiment showed no significant transfer from auditory presentation to subsequent visual recognition. A third experiment, designed to minimize the role of conscious guessing strategies showed a significant cross-model transfer. The logogen model was modified substantially in the light of these data. There are now seen to be modality specific input categorization systems which are separate from the output lexicon and which are identified as the site of facilitation in the experiments.This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effects of priming on picture recognitionBritish Journal of Psychology, 1982
- Language and speechPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1981
- The status of information processing models of languagePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1981
- A Reexamination of the Effect of Word Length on Recognition ThresholdsThe American Journal of Psychology, 1975
- In defense of sophisticated-guessing theory.Psychological Review, 1973
- Comments on Broadbent's response bias model for stimulus recognition.Psychological Review, 1970
- Two kinds of response priming in tachistoscopic recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
- On the word-frequency effect.Psychological Review, 1969
- Word-frequency effect and response bias.Psychological Review, 1967
- Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952