Cethromycin versus Clarithromycin for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Comparative Efficacy and Safety Outcomes from Two Double-Blinded, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Multicenter, Multinational Noninferiority Studies
- 1 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 56 (4), 2037-2047
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.05596-11
Abstract
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) continues to be a major health challenge in the United States and globally. Factors such as overprescribing of antibiotics and noncompliance with dosing regimens have added to the growing antibacterial resistance problem. In addition, several agents available for the treatment of CAP have been associated with serious side effects. Cethromycin is a new ketolide antibiotic that may provide prescribing physicians with an additional agent to supplement a continually limited armamentarium. Two global phase III noninferiority studies (CL05-001 and CL06-001) to evaluate cethromycin safety and efficacy were designed and conducted in patients with mild to moderate CAP. Study CL05-001 demonstrated an 83.1% clinical cure rate in the cethromycin group compared with 81.1% in the clarithromycin group (95% confidence interval [CI], −4.8%, +8.9%) in the intent to treat (ITT) population and a 94.0% cethromycin clinical cure rate compared with a 93.8% clarithromycin cure rate (95% CI, −4.5%, +5.1%) in the per protocol clinical (PPc) population. Study CL06-001 achieved an 82.9% cethromycin clinical cure rate in the ITT population compared with an 88.5% clarithromycin cure rate (95% CI, −11.9%, +0.6%), whereas the clinical cure rate in the PPc population was 91.5% in cethromycin group compared with 95.9% in clarithromycin group (95% CI, −9.1%, +0.3%). Both studies met the primary endpoints for clinical cure rate based on predefined, sliding-scale noninferiority design. Therefore, in comparison with clarithromycin, these two noninferiority studies demonstrated the efficacy and safety of cethromycin, with encouraging findings of efficacy in subjects with Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia. No clinically significant adverse events were observed during the studies. Cethromycin may be a potential oral therapy for the outpatient treatment of CAP.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deaths: final data for 2007.2010
- Safety and Tolerability of Commonly Prescribed Oral Antibiotics for the Treatment of Respiratory Tract InfectionsAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 2010
- Optimisation of storage conditions for maintaining culturability of penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in transport mediumBritish Journal of Biomedical Science, 2010
- Issues in Noninferiority Trials: The Evidence in Community‐Acquired PneumoniaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Emergence of Fluoroquinolones as the Predominant Risk Factor for Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea: A Cohort Study during an Epidemic in QuebecClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database studyThe Lancet, 2005
- Review of treatment guidelines for community-acquired pneumoniaThe American Journal of Medicine Supplements, 2004
- Comparison of In Vitro Activities of ABT-773 and Telithromycin against Macrolide-Susceptible and -Resistant Streptococci and StaphylococciAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
- Structures of ketolides and macrolides determine their mode of interaction with the ribosomal target siteJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2001
- Comparative In Vitro Activity of ABT-773, a Novel Antibacterial KetolideAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001