Is evolution gradual or rectangular? Evidence from living fishes.
- 1 November 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 74 (11), 5083-5087
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.11.5083
Abstract
The traditional view that most evolutionary change is gradual and cumulative within lineages (phyletic gradualism) has recently been challenged by the proposition that the majority of evolutionary change is concentrated within speciation events (rectangular evolution). The logical implications of these competing hypotheses for the means and variances of genetic distance among living members of rapidly and slowly speciating phylads are examined. An example of a critical test of gradual vs. rectangular evolution is provided by electrophoretic analyses of genic composition [isozymes] in 69 spp. of North American Cyprinidae (minnows), and 19 spp. of Centrarchidae (sunfish). Rate of protein evolution appears somewhat decelerated, if anything, in the rapidly speciating minnows. Results are inconsistent with predictions of rectangular evolution, but are not demonstrably incongruent with predictions of phyletic gradualism.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stability of Species in Geologic TimeScience, 1976
- GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION IN SPECIOSE VERSUS DEPAUPERATE PHYLADS: EVIDENCE FROM THE CALIFORNIA MINNOWSEvolution, 1976
- Clades versus Clones in Evolution: Why We Have SexScience, 1975
- ADAPTIVE DIFFERENTIATION WITH LITTLE GENIC CHANGE BETWEEN TWO NATIVE CALIFORNIA MINNOWSEvolution, 1975
- A theory of evolution above the species level.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1975