A comparison between the APACHE II and Charlson Index Score for predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients
Open Access
- 30 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 9 (1), 129
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-129
Abstract
Risk adjustment and mortality prediction in studies of critical care are usually performed using acuity of illness scores, such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), which emphasize physiological derangement. Common risk adjustment systems used in administrative datasets, like the Charlson index, are entirely based on the presence of co-morbid illnesses. The purpose of this study was to compare the discriminative ability of the Charlson index to the APACHE II in predicting hospital mortality in adult multisystem ICU patients.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admissionIntensive Care Medicine, 2005
- Study of clinical course of organ dysfunction in intensive careCritical Care Medicine, 2004
- Prediction of survival of critically ill patients by admission comorbidityJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter studyJAMA, 1993
- Applied Logistic RegressionTechnometrics, 1992
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Predicting the Outcome of Intensive Care Unit PatientsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1988
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985
- APACHE—acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification systemCritical Care Medicine, 1981