The Positive Predictive Value of Cervical Smears in Previously Screened Postmenopausal Women: The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS)
- 19 December 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 133 (12), 942-950
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-133-12-200012190-00009
Abstract
The benefits and risks of performing annual cervical smears on postmenopausal women are not well defined. The independent effect of hormone replacement therapy on development of cytologic abnormalities is unknown. To determine the positive predictive value of cervical smears in previously screened postmenopausal women and to determine the effect of oral estrogen plus progestin on incident cervical cytologic abnormalities. Prospective cohort study (incidence) and randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (hormone therapy). 20 U.S. outpatient and community clinical centers. 2561 women with a uterus and normal cytologic characteristics at baseline. Annual smears; oral conjugated equine estrogens, 0.625 mg/d, plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg/d, or identical placebo. Incident cytologic abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, low-grade squamous epithelial lesion, and high-grade squamous epithelial lesion) and final histologic diagnoses. The incidence of new cytologic abnormalities in the 2 years following a normal smear was 110 per 4895 person-years (23 per 1000 person-years [95% CI, 18 to 27 per 1000 person-years]). Among the 103 women with known histologic diagnoses, one had mild to moderate dysplasia. The positive predictive value of any smear abnormality identified 1 year after a normal smear, therefore, was 0% (CI, 0% to 5.0%) (0 of 78 women); the positive predictive value of abnormalities found within 2 years was 0.9% (CI, 0.0% to 3.0%) (1 of 110 women). In hormone-treated compared with non–hormone-treated women, the incidence of cytologic abnormalities was nonsignificantly higher (relative hazard, 1.36 [CI, 0.93 to 1.99]), largely because of a nonsignificant 58% greater incidence of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (relative hazard, 1.58 [CI, 0.99 to 2.52]). Because of a poor positive predictive value, cervical smears should not be performed within 2 years of normal cytologic results in postmenopausal women. Therapy with oral estrogen plus progestin does not significantly affect the incidence of cytologic abnormalities.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection of Human Papillomavirus DNA in Cytologically Normal Women and Subsequent Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial LesionsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Cervical cancer screening among low-income women: results of a national screening program, 1991–1995Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1999
- Human papillomavirus infection in postmenopausal women with and without hormone therapyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- Regulation of Human Papillomavirus Type 18in Vivo:Effects of Estrogen and Progesterone in Transgenic MiceGynecologic Oncology, 1997
- The Frequency of Human Papillomavirus Detection in Postmenopausal Women on Hormone Replacement TherapyGynecologic Oncology, 1997
- The case for stopping cervical screening at age 50.BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- Chronic estrogen-induced cervical and vaginal squamous carcinogenesis in human papillomavirus type 16 transgenic mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1996
- Psychological Response to Cervical ScreeningPreventive Medicine, 1995
- The current status of the Papanicolaou smearCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1995
- Risk Factors for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Differences between Low- and High-grade LesionsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1994