Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Physics in Medicine & Biology
- Vol. 44 (3), 751-764
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/3/017
Abstract
In this study we analysed the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) measurements in assessing cortical bone. We determined the dependency of thickness and density measurements on the true width and density of the cortex and on the spatial resolution in the CT images using two optimized segmentation methods. As a secondary goal, we assessed the ability of CT to reflect small changes in cortical thickness. Two different bone-mimicking phantoms with varying cortical thickness were scanned with single-slice CT on a Somatom Plus 4 scanner. Images were reconstructed with both a standard and a high-resolution convolution kernel. Two special operator-independent segmentation methods were used to automatically detect the edges of the cortical shell. We measured cortical thickness and density and compared the phantom measurements with theoretical computations by simulating a cross-sectional shape of the cortical shell. Based on the simulations, we calculated CT's power to detect small changes in cortical thickness. Simulations and phantom measurements were in very good agreement. Cortical thickness could be measured with an error of less than 10% if the true thickness was larger than 0.9 (0.7) mm for the standard (high-resolution) kernel which is close to the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the point spread functions for these kernels and our scanner. Density measurements yielded errors of less than 10% for true cortical thickness values above two to three times the FWHM corresponding to 2.5 (2) mm in our case. The simulations showed that a 10% change in cortical width would not be detected with satisfying probability in bones with a cortical shell thinner than 1.2 mm. An accurate determination of the cortical thickness is limited to bones with a thickness higher than the FWHM of the scanner's point spread function. Therefore, the use of a high-resolution reconstruction kernel is crucial. Cortical bone mineral density can only be measured accurately in bones two to three times thicker than this number. In thinner bones, the measured density becomes dependent on the thickness. Changes in cortical thickness can only be assessed if the change is rather large or if the measured bone has sufficient thickness. Therefore, assessing density or thickness of the vertebral shell by CT should be treated with caution.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurements of cortical thickness in experimentally created endosteal bone lesions: a comparison of radiography, CT, MR imaging, and anatomic sections.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1997
- Cortical and cancellous bone in the human femoral neck: Evaluation of an interactive image analysis systemBone, 1996
- Cortical mineral content of the radius assessed by peripheral QCT predicts compressive strength on biomechanical testingBone, 1995
- Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplateBone, 1994
- Age- and sex-related changes in iliac cortical bone mass and remodelingBone, 1993
- The assessment of vertebral bone macroarchitecture with x-ray computed tomographyCalcified Tissue International, 1993
- Vertebral structure and strengthIn vivo andIn vitroCalcified Tissue International, 1993
- Differential effects of aging and disease on trabecular and compact bone density of the radiusBone, 1991
- Cortical and Trabecular Bone Status in Elderly Women with Femoral Neck FractureClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1982
- The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebraeCalcified Tissue International, 1969