Ceftriaxone Compared with Cefotaxime for Serious Bacterial Infections
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 160 (3), 442-447
- https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/160.3.442
Abstract
Ceftriaxone was compared with cefotaxime for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The dose of ceftriaxone was 2 g once a day, and the dose of cefotaxime was 2 g every 4 h. Metronidazole was added if anaerobic infection was suspected. Explicit criteria were used to define infections, clinical response, and adverse effects. Ceftriaxone was given to 88 patients and cefotaxime to 83. The two treatment groups did not differ in types of infection, infecting organisms, and severity of underlying disease. The response rate was 81% (71/88) for ceftriaxone and 80% (66/83) for cefotaxime. The power of the study to detect a 15% difference in response rate at P < .1 was 90%. The frequency of diarrhea, thrombophlebitis, prothrombin time, prolongation, colonization, and superinfection did not differ between treatment groups. Ceftriaxone 2 g once a day was as safe and effective as cefotaxime 2 g every 4 h for suspected serious bacterial infections.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Once-Daily Therapy with Ceftriaxone Compared with Daily Multiple-Dose Therapy with Cefotaxime for Serious Bacterial Infections: A Randomized, Double-Blind StudyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1989
- The Postantibiotic EffectAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Cefotaxime Compared with Nafcillin Plus Tobramycin for Serious Bacterial InfectionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1984
- Ceftriaxone therapy of bone and soft tissue infections in hospital and outpatient settingsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1983
- Double-Blind Comparison of the Nephrotoxicity and Auditory Toxicity of Gentamicin and TobramycinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980