Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 18 (3), 327-334
- https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000094
Abstract
Objective To synthesize the literature on clinical decision-support systems' (CDSS) impact on healthcare practitioner performance and patient outcomeKeywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trialsBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2009
- The coming of age of artificial intelligence in medicineArtificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2008
- The Effect of Electronic Prescribing on Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2008
- Use of computer decision support interventions to improve medication prescribing in older adults: A systematic reviewThe American Journal of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy, 2008
- The Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry with Clinical Decision Support on the Rates of Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic ReviewJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Just What the Doctor Ordered. Review of the Evidence of the Impact of Computerized Physician Order Entry System on Medication ErrorsHealth Services Research, 2007
- Biomedical Informatics Applications for Asthma Care: A Systematic ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2006
- Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient OutcomesJAMA, 2005
- Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical surveyBMJ, 2004