Minimizing errors of omission: Behavioural rEenforcement of Heparin to Avert Venous Emboli: The BEHAVE Study*
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 34 (3), 694-699
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000201886.84135.cb
Abstract
To improve patient safety by increasing heparin thromboprophylaxis for medical-surgical intensive care unit patients using a multiple-method approach to evidence-based guideline development and implementation.Prospective longitudinal observational study.Medical-surgical intensive care unit.Multidisciplinary clinicians caring for critically ill patients in a 15-bed medical-surgical closed intensive care unit.Phase 1 was a 3-month baseline period during which we documented anticoagulation and mechanical thromboprophylaxis. Phase 2 was a 1-yr period in which we implemented a thromboprophylaxis guideline using a) interactive multidisciplinary educational in-services; b) verbal reminders to the intensive care unit team; c) computerized daily nurse recording of thromboprophylaxis; d) weekly graphic feedback to individual intensivists on guideline adherence; and e) publicly displayed graphic feedback on group performance. Phase 3 was a 3-month follow-up period 10 months later, during which we documented thromboprophylaxis. Computerized daily nurse recording of thromboprophylaxis continued in this period.Intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates were similar across phases, although patients in phase 2 had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores than patients in phases 1 and 3. The proportion (median % [interquartile range]) of intensive care unit patient-days of heparin thromboprophylaxis in phases 1, 2, and 3 was 60.0 (0, 100), 90.9 (50, 100), and 100.0 (60, 100), respectively (p=.01). The proportion (median % [interquartile range]) of days during which heparin thromboprophylaxis was omitted in error in phases 1, 2, and 3 was 20 (0, 53.8), 0 (0, 6.3), and 0 (0, 0), respectively (p<.001).After development and implementation of an evidence-based thromboprophylaxis guideline, we found significantly more patients receiving heparin thromboprophylaxis. Guideline adherence was maintained 1 yr later. Further research is needed on which are the most effective strategies to implement patient safety initiatives in the intensive care unit.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intensive care unit quality improvement: A “how-to” guide for the interdisciplinary team*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient OutcomesJAMA, 2005
- A Systematic Review of Strategies to Improve Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in HospitalsAnnals of Surgery, 2005
- A Computerized Reminder System to Increase the Use of Preventive Care for Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- Getting research findings into practice: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findingsBMJ, 1998
- The Incidence of Deep Venous Thrombosis in ICU PatientsChest, 1997
- Utilization of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in the Medical Intensive Care UnitChest, 1994
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985
- High risk of the critically ill for venous thromboembolismCritical Care Medicine, 1982