Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 56 (1), 19-38
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390247
Abstract
In this paper we argue that an individual's activities, prior to and during an interpersonal influence attempt, may be explained by his or her goals. Two classes of goals are posited: (1) primary or influence goals which instigate the influence process, and (2) secondary goals which shape it. Three studies are reported whose purpose was to illuminate the substance of each of these goals, to examine their relationships to one another, and finally, to show how the goals shape the interpersonal influence process (for the source) in terms of planning, effort, directness, positivity, and logic. The results suggest the existence of five secondary goals: identity goals, interaction goals, personal resource goals, relational resource goals, and arousal management goals. With the exception of personal goals, each of the goals makes a unique contribution to shaping the source's actions.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Individual Differences in Cognitive Editing StandardsHuman Communication Research, 1987
- Situation selection as a moderator of response consistency and stability.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Choice and avoidance of everyday situations and affect congruence: Two models of reciprocal interactionism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Anatomy of a persuasion schema: Targets, goals, and strategies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985
- PERCEPTIONS OF COMPLIANCE-GAINING SITUATIONSCommunication Research, 1984
- THE DISCOURSE OF REQUESTS.Human Communication Research, 1984
- The influence of individuals on situations: Implications for understanding the links between personality and social behaviorJournal of Personality, 1983
- THE STRANGER AND THE SPOUSE AS TARGET PERSONS FOR COMPLIANCE-GAINING STRATEGIES: A SUBJECTIVE EXPECTED UTILITY MODEL1Human Communication Research, 1980
- Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle?American Psychologist, 1971
- Affecting the salience of the social responsibility norm: effects of past help on the response to dependency relationships.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964