The cost‐effectiveness of ramipril in the treatment of patients at high risk of cardiovascular events: a Swedish sub‐study to the HOPE study
Open Access
- 22 May 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 251 (6), 508-517
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.00990.x
Abstract
Björholt I, Andersson FL, Kahan T, Östergren J (AstraZeneca Sverige AB, Mölndal, Sweden/Institute of Surgical Sciences, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden; AstraZeneca R & D Lund, Lund, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; and Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden) The cost‐effectiveness of ramipril in the treatment of patients at high risk of cardiovascular events: a Swedish sub‐study to the hope study. J Intern Med 2002; 251: 508–517. Objective. To evaluate if long‐term treatment with ramipril is cost‐effective in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events. Design. Randomized double‐blind and placebo controlled. Information was gathered prospectively for a number of direct medical, direct nonmedical and indirect costs. Setting and subjects. This is a sub‐study to the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study performed in Swedish patients. All Swedish centres (19; n= 554) were invited to take part and 18 centres agreed to do so (n=537). The patients were managed in a specialist setting with a mean follow‐up period of 4.5 years. Main outcome measures. The number of life‐years saved was derived from the global HOPE study (n=9297) and subsequently the estimated life expectancy of those who completed the clinical study alive was added to the calculation. Direct medical costs related to cardiovascular disease only were considered in the primary analysis, whilst all kinds of costs and costs for all kinds of diseases were included in subsequent analyses. The cost of added years of life, according to the future cost method, was included in sensitivity analyses. Results. The cost per life‐year gained was SEK 16 600 (Euro 1940) when direct medical costs for cardiovascular reasons only were considered and SEK 45 400 (Euro 5300) when direct medical costs for all diseases were considered. The corresponding costs when direct nonmedical and indirect cost were added to the estimate were SEK 16 100 (Euro 1880) and SEK 54 600 (Euro 6380), respectively. When the future cost method was applied, the cost per life‐year gained was SEK 208 300 (Euro 24 300). Conclusion. Ramipril is highly cost‐effective in the treatment of patients at high risk of cardiovascular events.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost Effectiveness of Bisoprolol in the Treatment of Chronic Congestive Heart Failure in SwedenPharmacoEconomics, 2001
- Cost-effectiveness of intense insulin treatment after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Results from the DIGAMI studyPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2000
- Methodology. Health-state utilities in a general population in relation to age, gender and socioeconomic factorsEuropean Journal of Public Health, 1999
- Cost Effectiveness in the Treatment of Heart Failure with RamiprilPharmacoEconomics, 1997
- Accounting for future costs in medical cost-effectiveness analysisJournal of Health Economics, 1997
- Inflammatory bowel disease: genes or germs?Journal of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Five‐Hundred Life‐Saving Interventions and Their Cost‐EffectivenessRisk Analysis, 1995
- Costs and Effectiveness of Routine Therapy with Long-Term Beta-Adrenergic Antagonists after Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Economic consequences of postinfarction prophylaxis with beta blockers: cost effectiveness of metoprolol.BMJ, 1987
- The Valuation of Human CapitalJournal of Political Economy, 1961