A Meta-Analysis of 17 Randomized Trials of a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Based Strategy in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease
- 9 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 52 (11), 894-904
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.051
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acute coronary syndromes without ST segment elevationBMJ, 2007
- Does Preventive PCI Work?New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2007 UpdateCirculation, 2007
- Benefit of Early Invasive Therapy in Acute Coronary SyndromesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Prognosis of stable angina pectoris: why we need larger population studies with higher endpoint resolutionHeart, 2006
- Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patientsEuropean Heart Journal, 2006
- Controversies in stable coronary artery diseaseThe Lancet, 2006
- Chronic Stable AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Indications for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Stable AnginaCirculation, 2003
- Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2003