Abstract
A simply structured high-level controller, called a "supervisor", has recently been proposed in part I of this article (ibid., vol.41, 1996) for the purpose of orchestrating the switching of a sequence of candidate set-point controllers into feedback with an imprecisely modeled SISO process so as to cause the output of the process to approach and track a constant reference input. The process is assumed to be modeled by an SISO linear system whose transfer function is in the union of a number of subclasses, each subclass being small enough so that one of the candidate controllers would solve the set-point tracking problem, if the process transfer function was to be one of the subclass members. This paper proves that without any further modification, the same supervisor described in Part I can also perform this function in the face of norm-bounded unmodeled dynamics, and moreover that none of the signals within the overall system can grow without bound in response to bounded disturbance and noise inputs, whether they are constant or not.