Interview vs. paper-and-pencil administration of the McGill pain questionnaire
- 1 October 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 11 (2), 241-246
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(81)90009-9
Abstract
In a 2 .times. 2 design, college student subjects described 1 of 2 levels of cold pressor pain (threshold or tolerance) with the McGill Pain Questionnaire [MPQ] administered via 1 of 2 modes (interview or paper-and-pencil). Interview administration was associated with higher scores on 5 of the 6 MPQ scores calculated. This effect is apparently not entirely attributable to increased probability of interviewed subjects'' endorsement of descriptors for which clarification of meaning was sought. Reliable effects of pain intensity were also found on 5 of the 6 measures, but in no case did pain intensity and mode of administration significantly interact.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sensitivity of the McGill pain questionnaire to intensity and quality of laboratory painPain, 1981
- Use of the McGill Pain Questionaire in the assessment of cancer pain: Replicability and consistencyPain, 1980
- The language of low back pain: Factor structure of the McGill pain questionnairePain, 1980
- Social disclosure, coactive peer companions, and social modelling determinants of pain communications.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 1978
- Factors of the language of pain in patient and volunteer groupsPain, 1977
- A comparison of primary dysmenorrhoea and intrauterine device related painPain, 1977
- The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methodsPain, 1975