A comparison of primary care information content in UpToDate and the National Guideline Clearinghouse*
Open Access
- 1 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University Library System, University of Pittsburgh in Journal of the Medical Library Association
- Vol. 95 (3), 255-259
- https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.95.3.255
Abstract
The study sought to determine if two major resources for primary care questions have significant differences in information content and whether the number of documents found differs by disease category, patient age, or patient gender. Seven hundred fifty-two questions were randomly selected from the Clinical Questions Collection of the National Library of Medicine. UpToDate and the National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC) were searched utilizing keywords from the questions. The number of documents retrieved for each question in the resources was recorded. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare differences in retrieval between the resources. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of patient age, patient gender, or disease category on the ability to find content. UpToDate returned 1 or more documents for 580 questions, while NGC returned at least 1 document for 493 questions (77.1% versus 65.5% of question sampled, P = 0.001). In combination, the 2 resources returned content for 91% of searches (n = 685). NGC retrieved a mean of 16.3 documents per question versus 8.7 documents from UpToDate. Disease category was the only variable having a significant impact on the presence of online resource content. UpToDate had greater breadth of content than NGC, while neither resource provided complete coverage. Current practice guidelines, as reflected by those in the NGC, addressed at most two-thirds of the selected clinical questions.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized trial for answers to clinical questions: evaluating a pre-appraised versus a MEDLINE search protocol.2006
- An evaluation of five bedside information products using a user-centered, task-oriented approach.2006
- Evaluation of the Content Coverage of SNOMED CT: Ability of SNOMED Clinical Terms to Represent Clinical Problem ListsMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2006
- Putting clinical trials into contextThe Lancet, 2005
- Evidence-based databases versus primary medical literature: an in-house investigation on their optimal use.2004
- Update on inflation of journal prices: Brandon/Hill list journals and the scientific, technical, and medical publishing market.2004
- The impact of evidence on physicians’ inpatient treatment decisionsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2004
- UpToDate: a comprehensive clinical database.2003
- Use of on-line evidence-based resources at the point of care.2003
- How Well Do Physicians Use Electronic Information Retrieval Systems?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998