Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Continuous versus Short-Term Infusion of Imipenem-Cilastatin in Critically Ill Patients in a Randomized, Controlled Trial
- 1 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 51 (9), 3304-3310
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01318-06
Abstract
Beta-lactams are regularly administered in intermittent short-term infusions. The percentage of the dosing interval during which free drug concentrations exceed the MIC (fT(>MIC)) is the measure of drug exposure that best correlates with clinical outcome for beta-lactams. Therefore, administration by continuous infusion has gained increasing interest recently. We studied 20 critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia and investigated whether continuous infusion with a reduced total dose, compared to the standard regimen of intermittent short-term infusion, results in a superior probability of target attainment as assessed by the fT(>MIC) value of imipenem. In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study, patients received either a loading dose of 1 g/1 g imipenem and cilastatin (as a short-term infusion) at time zero, followed by 2 g/2 g imipenem-cilastatin per 24 h as a continuous infusion for 3 days (n = 10), or 1 g/1 g imipenem-cilastatin three times per day as a short-term infusion for 3 days (total daily dose, 3 g/3 g; n = 10). Imipenem concentrations in plasma were determined by using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. A two-compartment open model was employed for population pharmacokinetic modeling. We simulated 10,000 intensive-care-unit patients via Monte Carlo simulations for pharmacodynamic evaluation using the target 40% fT(>MIC). The probability of target attainment by MIC for intermittent infusion was robust (>90%) up to MICs of 1 to 2 mg/liter. The corresponding value for continuous infusion was 2 to 4 mg/liter. Although all 20 patients had an fT(>MIC) of 100%, 3 patients died. Patient survival was best described by employing a sepsis-related organ failure assessment score as a covariate in a logistic regression analysis. Larger clinical trials are warranted for evaluation of continuous infusions at a reduced dose of imipenem for critically ill patients.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antimicrobial Resistance: Pharmacokinetics‐Pharmacodynamics of Antimicrobial Therapy: It’s Not Just for Mice AnymoreClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Meropenem and Imipenem in Critically Ill Patients with SepsisClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2005
- Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of 'bug and drug'Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2004
- Target concentration intervention: beyond Y2KBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2001
- Target concentration intervention: beyond Y2KBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2001
- Pharmacokinetic and Economic Evaluation of Piperacillin/Tazobactam Administered as Either Continuous or Intermittent Infusion with Once-Daily GentamicinInfectious Diseases in Clinical Practice, 1999
- Kinetics of antimicrobial activityThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1986
- Single-dose pharmacokinetics of imipenem in childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1984
- The plasma pharmacokinetics of high dose (1 g) imipenem coadministered with 1 g cilastatin in six normal volunteersEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1984
- Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equationsJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1978