Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant–abutment junction in an internally notched morse‐taper oral implant: influence of abutment design
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Vol. 15 (4), 459-465
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01023.x
Abstract
Purpose: To compare dynamic fatigue resistance of one- and two-piece abutments connected to internally notched morse-taper oral implants. Material and methods: Sixteen synOcta® ITI® implants were tightened into two metal models. SynOcta® abutments for cement-retained restorations and solid abutments were divided into two equal groups and were torque-tightened into the implants. Each implant received a cement-retained crown. Cyclic dynamic axial and lateral peak loads of 75±5 N were applied on the implants for a duty of 500,000 cycles at 0.5 Hz, and at an angle of 20°. Prior to the experiments and at each 100,000 cycles of loading, periotest values (PTVs) were measured. Removal torque values (RTVs) of the abutments were also measured with a custom-made torque device at the termination of the experiment. Results: All abutments and implants were clinically immobile and without any signs of mechanical failure. The final PTVs for both abutments were similar and the difference between groups was insignificant (P>0.05). The RTVs of solid abutments were significantly higher than synOcta® abutments (P<0.05). Conclusion: Predictable long-term clinical results can be achieved with solid abutments and synOcta® abutments for cement-retained restorations. Solid abutments possess higher removal torque resistance than synOcta® abutments when connected to synOcta® ITI® implants.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant–abutment complex of a reduced‐diameter morse‐taper implantClinical Oral Implants Research, 2003
- Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2002
- An in vitro evaluation of the strength of a 1-piece and 2-piece conical abutment joint in implant designClinical Oral Implants Research, 2000
- Mechanical complications of dental implantsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2000
- In vitro evaluation of the strength of the conical implant-to-abutment joint in two commercially available implant systemsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000
- Microleakage of compomer Class V restorations: Effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differencesThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000
- Long‐term evaluation of non‐submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8‐year life table analysis of a prospective multi‐center study with 2359 implants.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1997
- Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistryThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1997
- The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlationDental Materials, 1986
- A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jawInternational Journal of Oral Surgery, 1981