PREFERENCE AND RESISTANCE TO CHANGE WITH CONSTANT‐ AND VARIABLE‐DURATION TERMINAL LINKS: INDEPENDENCE OF REINFORCEMENT RATE AND MAGNITUDE
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 77 (3), 233-255
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2002.77-233
Abstract
Pigeons responded in a three-component multiple concurrent-chains procedure in which the variable-interval reinforcement schedules were the same across components but magnitudes differed across components. The terminal links were arranged either as a variable delay followed by presentation of a reinforcer (“variable duration”) or as a fixed period of access to the schedule during which a variable number of reinforcers could be earned (“constant duration”). Relative reinforcement rate was varied parametrically across both types of conditions. After baseline training in each condition, resistance to change of terminal-link responding was assessed by delivering food during the initial links according to a variable-time schedule. Both preference and resistance to change were more sensitive to reinforcement-rate differences in the constant-duration conditions. Sensitivities of preference and resistance to change to relative reinforcement rate did not change depending on relative reinforcement magnitude. Taken together, these results confirm and extend those of prior studies, and suggest that reinforcement rate and magnitude combine additively to determine preference and resistance to change. A single structural relation linking preference and resistance to change describes all the data from this and several related studies.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- VARIABLE‐RATIO VERSUS VARIABLE‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES: RESPONSE RATE, RESISTANCE TO CHANGE, AND PREFERENCEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2001
- SENSITIVITY TO RELATIVE REINFORCER RATE IN CONCURRENT SCHEDULES: INDEPENDENCE FROM RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE REINFORCER DURATIONJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2001
- COMPARING PREFERENCE AND RESISTANCE TO CHANGE IN CONSTANT-AND VARIABLE-DURATION SCHEDULE COMPONENTSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2000
- PREFERENCE AND RESISTANCE TO CHANGE WITH CONSTANT‐DURATION SCHEDULE COMPONENTSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2000
- STIMULI, REINFORCERS, AND BEHAVIOR: AN INTEGRATIONJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1999
- ON THE RELATION BETWEEN PREFERENCE AND RESISTANCE TO CHANGEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1997
- INDEPENDENCE OF REINFORCEMENT DELAY AND MAGNITUDE IN CONCURRENT CHAINSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1995
- A CONTEXTUAL MODEL OF CONCURRENT‐CHAINS CHOICEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1994
- EFFECTS OF RATE OF REINFORCEMENT‐TIME UPON CONCURRENT OPERANT PERFORMANCE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970
- A PROGRESSION FOR GENERATING VARIABLE‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962