The economic burden of back pain in the UK
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 84 (1), 95-103
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00187-6
Abstract
Ely paid for directly by patients and their families. With respect to the distribution of cost across different providers, 37% relates to care provided by physiotherapists and allied specialists, 31% is incurred in the hospital sector, 14% relates to primary care, 7% to medication, 6% to community care and 5% to radiology and imaging used for investigation purposes. However, the direct cost of back pain is insignificant compared to the cost of informal care and the production losses related to it, which total £10668 million. Overall, back pain is one of the most costly conditions for which an economic analysis has been carried out in the UK and this is in line with findings in other countries. Further research is needed to establish the cost-effectiveness of alternative back pain treatments, so as to minimise cost and maximise the health benefit from the resources used in this area....Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE COST OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISRheumatology, 1996
- A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The NetherlandsPain, 1995
- Cost-of-illness studies: fact or fiction?The Lancet, 1994
- What Price Depression?The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1994
- Low back pain in eight areas of Britain.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1992
- Towards a new approach for estimating indirect costs of diseaseSocial Science & Medicine, 1992
- Cost, Controversy, Crisis: Low Back Pain and the Health of the PublicAnnual Review of Public Health, 1991
- Back Pain and SciaticaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- 1987 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences: A New Clinical Model for the Treatment of Low-Back PainSpine, 1987
- The Intensity of Work Recovery in Low Back PainSpine, 1983