Let π1, π2, …, πk be k ≥ 2 sources of observations (treatments, populations) and suppose the “goodness” of treatment πi is characterized by the size of an unknown real-valued parameter θi. Let θ[k] = max1≤i≤k θi. If πi is preferred to πj when θi > θj, the parameters δi = θ[k] — θi, i = 1, 2, …, k reflect in an inverse sense the “goodness” of each treatment relative to the “best” treatment. A general technique for obtaining simultaneous confidence intervals on the δi is demonstrated with several examples. This technique can be applied in any setting where comparison-with-control intervals can be computed regarding any πj as the control. These results have special importance in ranking and selection problems in that the process of generating upper bounds on the δi generates traditional confidence statements of both the indifference zone and the subset selection schools, simultaneously, as established by Hsu (1981).