Approximate Likelihood-Ratio Test for Branches: A Fast, Accurate, and Powerful Alternative
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Systematic Biology
- Vol. 55 (4), 539-552
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600755453
Abstract
We revisit statistical tests for branches of evolutionary trees reconstructed upon molecular data. A new, fast, approximate likelihood-ratio test (aLRT) for branches is presented here as a competitive alternative to nonparametric bootstrap and Bayesian estimation of branch support. The aLRT is based on the idea of the conventional LRT, with the null hypothesis corresponding to the assumption that the inferred branch has length 0. We show that the LRT statistic is asymptotically distributed as a maximum of three random variables drawn from the distribution. The new aLRT of interior branch uses this distribution for significance testing, but the test statistic is approximated in a slightly conservative but practical way as 2(ℓ1− ℓ2), i.e., double the difference between the maximum log-likelihood values corresponding to the best tree and the second best topological arrangement around the branch of interest. Such a test is fast because the log-likelihood value ℓ2 is computed by optimizing only over the branch of interest and the four adjacent branches, whereas other parameters are fixed at their optimal values corresponding to the best ML tree. The performance of the new test was studied on simulated 4-, 12-, and 100-taxon data sets with sequences of different lengths. The aLRT is shown to be accurate, powerful, and robust to certain violations of model assumptions. The aLRT is implemented within the algorithm used by the recent fast maximum likelihood tree estimation program PHYML (Guindon and Gascuel, 2003).Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Theoretical Foundation of the Balanced Minimum Evolution Method of Phylogenetic Inference and Its Relationship to Weighted Least-Squares Tree FittingMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2003
- Comparing Bootstrap and Posterior Probability Values in the Four-Taxon CaseSystematic Biology, 2003
- Bayes or Bootstrap? A Simulation Study Comparing the Performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Sampling and Bootstrapping in Assessing Phylogenetic ConfidenceMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2003
- Comparison of Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood Bootstrap Measures of Phylogenetic ReliabilityMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2003
- Molecular phylogenetic evidence refuting the hypothesis of Batoidea (rays and skates) as derived sharksMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2003
- Combined Data, Bayesian Phylogenetics, and the Origin of the New Zealand Cicada GeneraSystematic Biology, 2002
- Biological Sequence AnalysisPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1998
- On the Interpretation of Bootstrap Trees: Appropriate Threshold of Clade Selection and Induced GainMolecular Biology and Evolution, 1996
- Markov Chain Monte Carlo Convergence Diagnostics: A Comparative ReviewJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- On the Distribution of the Likelihood RatioThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1954