Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 17 (5), 401-406
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01719.x
Abstract
There is increasing evidence that animals share with adult humans and perhaps human infants a system for representing objective number as psychological magnitudes that are an analogue of the quantities they represent. Here we show that rhesus monkeys can extend a numerical rule learned with the values 1 through 9 to the values 10, 15, 20, and 30, which suggests that there is no upper limit on a monkey's numerical capacity. Instead, throughout the numerical range tested, both accuracy and latency in ordering two numerical values were systematically controlled by the ratio of the values compared. In a second experiment, we directly compared humans' and monkeys' performance in the same ordinal comparison task. The qualitative and quantitative similarity in their performance provides the strongest evidence to date of a single nonverbal, evolutionarily primitive mechanism for representing and comparing numerical values.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Semantic congruity affects numerical judgments similarly in monkeys and humansProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005
- The independence of language and mathematical reasoningProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005
- The construction of large number representations in adultsCognition, 2002
- The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog MagnitudesPsychological Science, 2002
- Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbersPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2001
- Representation of the numerosities 1–9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2000
- Ordering of the Numerosities 1 to 9 by MonkeysScience, 1998
- Varieties of numerical abilitiesCognition, 1992
- Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1990
- Comparisons of digits and dot patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974