Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: sensitivity of double- and single-contrast studies
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 140 (6), 1143-1149
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.140.6.1143
Abstract
A total of 1,140 primary colorectal carcinomas found in 1084 patients during a 5 1/2-year period (1976 to mid-1981) at the Mayo Clinic was reviewed to evaluate the accuracy of detection by the double- and single-contrast barium enema examinations. Both methods were equally sensitive in detecting colon cancer above the proctoscopic level. The error rate (ulcerative colitis excluded) was 4.8% for the single-contrast enema and 4.7% for the double-contrast study. Neither type of examination was superior in finding smaller lesions or earlier staged lesions. Several causes for error were identified: fluoroscopic inexperience, technical factors, misinterpretation of radiologic findings, and distraction.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection of rectal and rectosigmoid lesions by double-contrast barium enema examination and sigmoidoscopy. Accuracy of technique and efficacy of standard overhead views.Radiology, 1982
- Single- vs. double-contrast gastrointestinal studies: critical analysis of reported statisticsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1981
- Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perceptionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1981
- Sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema: emphasis on polyp detectionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1980
- COLONOSCOPY IN THE DETECTION OF CARCINOMA OF THE INTESTINE1979
- Comparison of Barium Enema and Colonoscopy in the Detection of Small Colonic PolypsRadiology, 1977
- Results of the Malmo technique of colon examinationJAMA, 1967