Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data
- 15 October 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 14 (19), 2057-2079
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780141902
Abstract
Meta‐analyses using updated individual patient data may provide the most reliable means of combining data from similar randomized controlled trials. The benefits of this approach to systematic reviews are described. Guidance, based on the experience of several groups who have undertaken such projects, is given. This includes practical advice on initiating and maintaining collaboration, the time and resources required to undertake these usually international projects and methods of data checking and validation. Example proforma are included.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994
- Systematic Reviews: Obtaining data from randomised controlled trials: how much do we need for reliable and informative meta-analyses?BMJ, 1994
- Completeness of reporting trial results: effect on physicians' willingness to prescribeThe Lancet, 1994
- The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health CareAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993
- Meta-analysisThe Lancet, 1993
- Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?The Lancet, 1993
- Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapyThe Lancet, 1992
- Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: an overview of randomised clinical trials. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists Group.BMJ, 1991
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991